Search This Blog

Wednesday, 15 January 2014

Existentialism and Sartre's Theory

          Existentialism is a philosophical movement which puts more focus on individual existence, freedom and choice (Pecorino, 2000). It is a view taken up by scholars who wanted to get rid of the disputes between the materialist and the idealist viewpoints (Pecorino, 2000). Jean Paul Sartre (1905-1980) was one such writer and philosopher who influenced this view very much. His theory holds a special place in Existentialism which gives us a unique perspective on what is real and what is unreal. We will examine the features, strengths and weaknesses of the Existentialist view, and appealing and discouraging parts of Sartre’s Theory in this paper.
          The main feature of Existentialist view is that they see the things from humans’ perspective. They place an individual at the center and explore how that human thinks, acts and feels. They place their ideas on what can be certainly known by humans. It focuses on the fact that first of all a person is an individual and only then he/she is bounded by other social and psychological aspects (Wikipedia, 2013). The strength of Existentialism is that it puts an individual as the main character of determining reality and giving meaning to life, which has been used in Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapies by inspirational scholars like Viktor Frankl. The weakness of this view might be that it disregards things beyond human experience which can be taken as simply avoiding disputable things rather than proving something to solve them or help in better understanding.
          Sartre’s Theory says that there are two types of real things: being-for-itself and being-in-itself (Pecorino, 2000). The first one consists of non conscious things and the second one is conscious and free. In-itself exists without depending on other things. On the contrary, since consciousness is always of something and therefore is relative to something else, for-itself cannot be identified completely (Onof, 2010). So, the appealing part about this is that it addresses both certainty and uncertainty of human experience. It describes the lack of identity faced by many people. On the other hand, the discouraging part is that his idea behind “Nothingness” seems just a logical fact of negating the presence of something, but he applies it to cancelling the deterministic constraints and achieving “freedom”. It is not convincing that “freedom” is something that can be achieved by isolation from constraints just by negating the constraints.       
          So, Existentialism is all about seeing philosophy from the view of pure human experience. The strong point about it is its usefulness in Psychological fields and the weakness lies in simply avoiding the disputes. Moving on, Sartre’s Theory is a unique notion in Existentialism which covers the certain and uncertain aspect of human experience. Nonetheless, his notion of “freedom” does not seem that convincing which is based on the idea of logical negation.
References:
Pecorino, P. (2000), Metaphysics: Existentialism, Introduction to Philosophy, Retrieved from http://www.qcc.cuny.edu/SocialSciences/ppecorino/INTRO_TEXT/Chapter%204%20Metaphysics/Existentialism.htm
Onof, C.J. (2010), Sartre’s Theory, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/sartre-ex/
Wikipedia (2013), Existentialism, Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existentialism
©Dixit Bhatta 2014

No comments:

Post a Comment

Translate