Since the inception of human civilization, there
have been philosophers who have pursued answers to the fundamental ideas
related with our lives. Philosophers have investigated abstract things such as
thinking, metaphysics, logic, art, religion, knowledge, mind, and ethics and so
on. They have inquired answers to the fundamental problems of human life by
critical thinking and using rational arguments. And there have been ideas that
have been pondered upon by people of different civilizations and time. Out of
many philosophers we will compare and contrast the philosophical attitude of
two brilliant minds of markedly different time: Socrates and Voltaire.
Socrates’ attitude about philosophy was mainly
dominated by the argument about what is good and the disagreement between
people about it. He claimed that people always go for good things. They do
wrong because they think that it will do good to them or give them some sort of
pleasure. Upon realizing that it is bad, they would not do it anymore. On the
other hand, Voltaire’s view, based on the Good Brahmin’s case, stresses on
happiness and ignorance. He states that happiness is best achieved when we are
ignorant but that kind of happiness is not worthwhile. The Brahmin laments his
lack of knowledge about reality and his own existence despite being a learned
man. Had he been a “simpleton” he would have had no regrets, yet he does not
desire such felicity. This creates a contradiction in itself and raises even further
questions.
As of now, both seem to have different ideas.
Nevertheless, if we see things from a different angle, we may still find some
similarities between them. According to Socrates, people do wrong things
because they think that it will give them happiness. This is analogous to the
old lady in Voltaire’s description who was content with the life without
knowledge and considered herself the happiest women. If she was educated, she
would have never liked such life- a life of illusions. Another similarity
between their attitudes towards philosophy is that Socrates used inductive
method to develop “universal definitions”, and we can clearly see that Voltaire
used the same inductive approach to derive his conclusion from the Good
Brahmin’s case.
References:
Pecorino, P.A. (2000), Chapter 2: The Greeks-
Socrates Legacy, An Introduction to
Philosophy, Accessed: September 9, 2013 from http://www.qcc.cuny.edu/SocialSciences/ppecorino/INTRO_TEXT/Chapter%202%20GREEKS/Socrates_Legacy.htm
Voltaire
(n.d.), Story of a Good Brahmin,
Translated by: Woolf, H.I., Accessed:
September 9, 2013 from http://www.k-state.edu/english/baker/english287/Voltaire-Story_of_a_Good_Brahmin.htm
©Dixit Bhatta 2014
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Delete